<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Broadway vs Small Pairs Flop Analysis</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.countingtheodds.com/2009/12/broadway-vs-small-pairs-flop-analysis/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.countingtheodds.com/2009/12/broadway-vs-small-pairs-flop-analysis/</link>
	<description>A Mathematical Journey into the World of Poker</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 23 Nov 2011 04:05:12 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Lexine</title>
		<link>http://www.countingtheodds.com/2009/12/broadway-vs-small-pairs-flop-analysis/comment-page-1/#comment-155</link>
		<dc:creator>Lexine</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 20 May 2011 20:52:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.countingtheodds.com/?p=70#comment-155</guid>
		<description>Didnt know the forum rules allowed such briallnit posts.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Didnt know the forum rules allowed such briallnit posts.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Counting The Odds &#187; Pre-flop Raise, then C-bet Strategy</title>
		<link>http://www.countingtheodds.com/2009/12/broadway-vs-small-pairs-flop-analysis/comment-page-1/#comment-112</link>
		<dc:creator>Counting The Odds &#187; Pre-flop Raise, then C-bet Strategy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 28 Mar 2010 16:28:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.countingtheodds.com/?p=70#comment-112</guid>
		<description>[...] say I have a hand like AJ suited. I then have more than 13.75% chance of hitting TPTK or better, as discussed here. If we use that 13.75% (which, as one of the commentors pointed out, is in actual fact, a low [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] say I have a hand like AJ suited. I then have more than 13.75% chance of hitting TPTK or better, as discussed here. If we use that 13.75% (which, as one of the commentors pointed out, is in actual fact, a low [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Derrick Kwa</title>
		<link>http://www.countingtheodds.com/2009/12/broadway-vs-small-pairs-flop-analysis/comment-page-1/#comment-105</link>
		<dc:creator>Derrick Kwa</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 24 Mar 2010 22:52:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.countingtheodds.com/?p=70#comment-105</guid>
		<description>Yes, definitely. But basically, I&#039;m looking at what hands are &quot;easier&quot; to play. In the sense of, when you can feel confident of your hand. There are always going to be a lot of cases where each hand is ahead. If you look at it from the other point of view, a mid pair of 8-8 could still be ahead without flopping a set. But it makes it a much more marginal hand and harder to play.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;The premis was which hand is easier to play, and so I don&#039;t really want to be looking at more marginal situations like a flop of QJ5.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yes, definitely. But basically, I&#39;m looking at what hands are &#8220;easier&#8221; to play. In the sense of, when you can feel confident of your hand. There are always going to be a lot of cases where each hand is ahead. If you look at it from the other point of view, a mid pair of 8-8 could still be ahead without flopping a set. But it makes it a much more marginal hand and harder to play.</p>
<p>The premis was which hand is easier to play, and so I don&#39;t really want to be looking at more marginal situations like a flop of QJ5.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Derrick Kwa</title>
		<link>http://www.countingtheodds.com/2009/12/broadway-vs-small-pairs-flop-analysis/comment-page-1/#comment-74</link>
		<dc:creator>Derrick Kwa</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 14 Mar 2010 11:58:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.countingtheodds.com/?p=70#comment-74</guid>
		<description>Yeah, I think the point I was getting at was the idea that (as stated in the first paragraph) a hand like AJ is easier to play than a pocket pair.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Generally, on most flops, you tend to be (or at least to feel) quite safe with TPTK or better. Yes, you can still win if you don&#039;t actually have a made hand, but it becomes a marginal situation, which doesn&#039;t make it &quot;easier to play&quot;, in a sense. So I&#039;m looking more for times when we can be confident in our made hand.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yeah, I think the point I was getting at was the idea that (as stated in the first paragraph) a hand like AJ is easier to play than a pocket pair.</p>
<p>Generally, on most flops, you tend to be (or at least to feel) quite safe with TPTK or better. Yes, you can still win if you don&#39;t actually have a made hand, but it becomes a marginal situation, which doesn&#39;t make it &#8220;easier to play&#8221;, in a sense. So I&#39;m looking more for times when we can be confident in our made hand.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Matt</title>
		<link>http://www.countingtheodds.com/2009/12/broadway-vs-small-pairs-flop-analysis/comment-page-1/#comment-68</link>
		<dc:creator>Matt</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 13 Mar 2010 11:33:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.countingtheodds.com/?p=70#comment-68</guid>
		<description>In calculating the 13.749% chance of AJ hitting the flop, you&#039;ve ignored all the cases where the flop comes Axx. (You mentioned that you weren&#039;t sure how to quantify the times the opponent has AQ or AK, but then you didn&#039;t include any figure in the sum for the Axx case).  &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Also it is possible for AJ suited to hit the flop in other ways. For example if the flop comes T72 with 2 of the suit then you have the best hand (if the opponent didn&#039;t flop a set). Also there are flops like QT9. &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;I think if you include the Axx cases and the big draws you&#039;re going to find that you &quot;hit&quot; the flop with AJs somewhere around 45% of the time. (or a bit less once you discount the opponent AQ and AK cases). &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;I also think you should not be too quick to discount flops like QJ5 ; as we are still ahead of a lot of the opponent&#039;s range on a flop like this.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In calculating the 13.749% chance of AJ hitting the flop, you&#39;ve ignored all the cases where the flop comes Axx. (You mentioned that you weren&#39;t sure how to quantify the times the opponent has AQ or AK, but then you didn&#39;t include any figure in the sum for the Axx case).  </p>
<p>Also it is possible for AJ suited to hit the flop in other ways. For example if the flop comes T72 with 2 of the suit then you have the best hand (if the opponent didn&#39;t flop a set). Also there are flops like QT9. </p>
<p>I think if you include the Axx cases and the big draws you&#39;re going to find that you &#8220;hit&#8221; the flop with AJs somewhere around 45% of the time. (or a bit less once you discount the opponent AQ and AK cases). </p>
<p>I also think you should not be too quick to discount flops like QJ5 ; as we are still ahead of a lot of the opponent&#39;s range on a flop like this.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Math Corrections: TPTK Odds &#171; Counting The Odds</title>
		<link>http://www.countingtheodds.com/2009/12/broadway-vs-small-pairs-flop-analysis/comment-page-1/#comment-10</link>
		<dc:creator>Math Corrections: TPTK Odds &#171; Counting The Odds</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 27 Dec 2009 12:49:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.countingtheodds.com/?p=70#comment-10</guid>
		<description>[...] back at my post on Broadway vs Small Pairs, I realize I made a mistake in one of the calculations. In the post, I said this: There are 2 more [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] back at my post on Broadway vs Small Pairs, I realize I made a mistake in one of the calculations. In the post, I said this: There are 2 more [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

